Month: April 2015

The Canon 60d and 7d stack up well against each other, why choose one over the other? It’s actually quite simple, it boils down to value. Each one has its advantages and inherent downfalls, but one of them is a better buy. Read the facts and you be the judge.

Hardware and Software Features

The 60d and 7d both have a variety of hardware and software features that are unique of the other, making either one a viable choice for a camera in this class. The housing of each, feels well made and the well designed style of the pair is sharp and visually pleasing. They both rest comfortably in the hand while shooting but the 60d is lighter. In contrast, the 7d is thinner and looks a bit more rugged.

The 60d has a flip out screen and is higher in resolution. The 7d has quite a bit less shutter leg and can boast significantly more focus points. The 7d is weather sealed, the other doesn’t The 60d on the other hand has a much longer battery life while it’s opponent has a superior dynamic range and a better view finder.

The comparison points stay neck and neck for the category of function and feature, at entirely opposite ends of the spectrum. They almost reflect the antithesis of their counterpart as they are reviewed. It can’t be argued that either could be claimed as the more valuable choice. And it makes sense that, depending on your application for the product, one might be more suitable for the individual consumer over its contender.

There is a final area that needs to be considered, that is economy. The price points of the 60d in contrast to the 7d, may be the deciding factor for the diligent shopper. The 60 comes in at around forty percent less than the 7d, which can go for as much as 700 dollars or more. If you need to save the money, the more affordable camera may be the smarter purchase. Whereas, if you need better detail and picture quality, the 7d may make the most sense.

Is bigger better? If you think about it for a moment may seem like a trick question. The answer is invariably relative to the subject at hand. Of course, in some cases, bigger is better. Yet in other arenas, smaller makes more sense. In stacking up the component qualities of the 3DS and its XL counterpart, keep that question (and it’s relativity in mind). There are several differences between Nintendo’s 3DS and the 3DXL, and however subtle some of them may be, the results are in and consumer bias is clear.

Design and Specifications

Let’s first look at overall design, style and the hardware specs that separate these two. The 3DS weighs in at 8oz, not a heavy load by any means. The XL comes in at 12 ounces. The difference in mass between the two is easily noticed when holding them for comparison. So what do you get for the four additional ounces? The screen size of the heavier model is 4.88 inches. In contrast, the 3DS is a mere 3.53 inches. That is over an inch of screen, and you will definitely notice it. It’s like comparing a 19” flat screen to a 32”. When you look at them, next to one another, the variance seems astronomical. The larger screen appears to allow more detail. And when playing a game, that could mean the difference between life and death (for your character).

How Do They Measure?

But by no means is that the only thing that sets these two apart. The battery of the XL version will last up to an hour and a half longer, which may make a long drive a little easier to bear. Another dissimilarity between them is the placement of the stylus storage. While to some, this may not be important, others may find that the stylus of the 3DS, being stored in the back of the device, a bit clunky or inconvenient. Whereas, the DSXL stores it’s stylus on the side, allowing easier access and the ability to maintain focus on the screen while retrieving it.

The look of the systems themselves is strikingly different. The larger system looks more modern, with it’s sleek, rounded design and laptop style. While the smaller opponent’s components are a throwback to the game boy, boxy and bulky. And, although the 4oz between the two systems can be felt, the larger XL does feel very light for being so large. Therefore, the added features far outweigh the additional mass.

Key Differences

The XL can also boast double the storage of the 3DS, with it’s 4g sd card. The cameras of each are internal 0.3 megapixel that are integrated well into the design of the system. So you won’t be blocking out the lens on either while trying to use it. However, the pictures taken on the 3DSXL appear more brilliant on screen and with more clarity.

The only real advantages that the smaller model has over the larger version are price and color choice. There are more colors currently offered with the standard shell of the 3DS than the more feature packed of the two. But spending the extra dollars may prove wise in the long run, even if you have to wait a little longer to afford the XL. The larger, DSXL can also download software faster than the other, making it more functional when time is of the essence.

Many gamers also noticed that, though both consoles have stereo speakers built in, the XL sounds better. Maybe this is because of speaker placement and distance or just the overall size of the system. In either case, both are a vast upgrade from the old single speaker of the 2’s. It’s also been mentioned that when playing games, more can be distinguished in character speaking with the bigger package.

Interaction and Feel

Another point to pay attention to is, the dynamics of visual game play. It’s easy to get lost in the details of specs and stats. But it comes down to: what you see is what you get. The larger screen also projects moving play more clearly and with more radiant colors. This allows for more vivid detail and absorption into story world during play. After all, it’s primarily for playing games and 3D entertainment. The XL wins in both of the major categories of the comparison.

In many ways, the smaller one feels cheaper. Not that it feels cheap, but the casing of the XL surely seems to be constructed with a more durable design. Whether that is simply the style or actually materials used, remains hard to tell. One thing that is not hard to tell, is that even though the XL is larger, Nintendo did an excellent job with maximizing the component’s feature to dimension ratio. They were sure to utilize the space the larger platform provides, to create a comfortable hand-held with superior screen resolution and overall function.

Scope and Scale

The two systems from Nintendo are on very different stations on the spectrum that is hand-held tech. They serve very similar functions while doing them in wildly unequal ways. Yes, the XL costs more, but you will get an immediate sense of where that money went when you calculate the performance versus price analysis of the two. The question then becomes, how important is gaming to you? If inferior vantage in the scope and scale of the quality of your game play does not bother you, than you may not find it worth the added investment.

On the other hand, many believe it’s been made abundantly clear that Nintendo believes you get what you pay for. In their case meaning value for your dollar. It may also be important to note that the 3DSXL Gives a more mature overall impression, existing more in the realm of notebooks and tablets. Whereas, the lighter model gives off more of an adolescent essence. All in all, the 3DS seems to be a whole lot smaller, with less to offer. So, is the answer apparent? Is bigger better? You decide.

These glasses are more than hype, they deliver on the Oakley promise of form and function. Whether you’re climbing a mountain, biking across country, or on the back nine in the bright light of mid day, the Oakley Flak Jacket series make a great choice for UV protection and durable luxury. But what are the characteristics that separate the XLJ’s and the standard Flak Jackets?

Getting Familiar with the Flak Jacket

It’s all about the lenses. You will most likely find that the more traditional lenses of the Flak Jackets provide the comfort that Oakleys are known for with the style projected by many golf tour champions. In other words, they look like a classic and feel like a ride in a convertible, with the top down, on a spring afternoon. If charming and high quality are important to you, these will more than satisfy your needs and style. Either will make a great pair of sun glasses for any outdoor activities.

What Does the Flak Jacket XLJ Have to Offer?

On the other hand, the XlJ’s cross a trend setting lens design with the functional benefits of high standards of construction. Making them a wonderful choice for pack leaders, looking for a uniquely comfortable frame and lens combination. Not only do they look sharp but if your facial structure does not fit the typical style of lenses, theses have a notable advantage for you. Because of the wave-like, drop back and flat bottom design, they tend to set well on people who don’t have high cheek bones. And just as the Flak Jacket, many pro golfers and sportsmen choose this more futuristic design.

Be aware, some people have complained that the XLJ’s can look like large, overbearing goggles, on those with smaller or more narrow faces. Both styles are built with the wearer’s comfort in mind and both exceed the standard for excellence, leaving the only questions left being, what are the specs of each pair’s composition? And does it make any bit of difference, in comparison of quality?

So, here is the rundown. The frames are the same in design and each can be customized. The lenses can be replaced with a different style, color or feature. The XLJ lenses can be quite a bit more in cost, depending on the special features you want. The average price difference ringing in at about 75 to 80 dollars on retail websites. Ultimately, they come in neck and neck in most of the categories of comparison. It comes down to the opening statement of this article and, more critically, the statement you want to make when wearing arguably the most important accessory you can buy.

When it comes to Nikon, many fans are hard pressed to point out a declared favorite among the crowd. But it is clear, between the d7000 and the d71000, there is a better choice. While both can capture video in High definition, 1080p quality, the 7100 comes in with a much higher frame rate. With 60 frames per second vs. the 7000’s mere 24 fps. This difference is not one to be overlooked, as the quality will be noticed when viewing. The 7100 also has a notably larger screen, giving it both hardware and software capabilities that the 7000 lacks.

What Does The Nikon D7000 Have to Offer?

The significantly, (about 30%), higher screen resolution of the 7100 will be noticed when you are shooting. It also has in camera HDR (high dynamic range), which can make your images look much clearer and better, as long as you understand how and when to use it. The 7000 is missing this feature. It’s already becoming easier to see why the 7100 is the superior camera, and the spectrum between the two widens as we proceed.

Differences With The Nikon D7100

The much higher true resolution of the 7100 (24MP vs. the 7000’s mere 16.1MP), which is also the lighter camera of the pair, makes it the choice for ease of use and professional features and qualities that almost raises it to a different category than the d7000. The lighter camera can also claim better overall image quality as well as more focus points. Both cameras are about the same size, however the superior 7100 packs far more into a package of equal size.

Not that the 7000 doesn’t have some points, to boast about, they are just not even close in importance. With the only major win in its category, being economic efficiency, it does not offer a whole lot of consumer points to count on. It does have a longer battery life (10 percent more shots), and slightly less shutter lag. If the money difference weighs heavily on your decision, you shouldn’t feel like the d7000 is a bad choice, but be aware of its limitations.

Now, the down side. If you want the best, it will cost more than the rest. While the 7100 is has a more than fair price tag for its standard of excellence in its category, it costs nearly three hundred to three hundred and dollars more than it’s lesser counterpart, the d7000. But the proof of the value in the money you spend is, immediately identifiable when you compare the two side by side. The better of the two can be felt, holding it hand and realizing that it is the right one for anybody who is serious about a better standard for capturing the moment.